Probably the most powerful tool used in combination with EARTH methodology it clearly enables you to see the possibility of ETA as a work in progress on Earth. The downside is you must overcome HNFS in order to see something more unpleasant than EMSR taking place.
What makes EPMS so difficult to recognize is that in order to see it, you have to move beyond the possibility Hetlau. In other words, you can't just believe Hetlau is possible, your mind actually has to shift into a different mode where it knows Hetlau.
Let's use the analogy of your house possibly being on fire to understand the concept of knowing Hetlau. If you believe its possible your house is on fire but you are not sure, the only action you are going to take is to investigate the possibility. So with Hetlau, most people won't even investigate the possibility but for the few who want to comprehend EPMS, they will.
So just like the possibility of your house being on fire, you look for clues such as smoke. If you see smoke and follow it to a room and open the door and the room is on fire, you immediately change your state of mind into one of knowing, not of believing. No longer is the house possibly on fire, it is on fire and you need to either evacuate or call 911, there is no grey area anymore. Your mind went from believing to knowing.
With the possibility of Hetlau, it is very difficult to go from believing to knowing. The only way you would get corroboration from an authority figure would be disclosure. If you wait that long, you essentially have waited too long. That is the equivalent of the fire department showing up to your house to tell you it's on fire. As a homeowner, you should be able to figure out it is on fire. Once you transition your mind to the awareness level of an EA you can determine Hetlau without the need for disclosure.
The problem arises in calculating Hetlau when to use the fire analogy, you sense smoke and want to see if there is fire, society is going to tell you are suffering from a delusional disorder and or a schizophrenic break from reality. So it is not going to be a pleasant process. Also when you realize Hetlau you aren't going to be able to call the fire department so to speak as your going to realize that the discovery of Hetlau possibly infers EPMS which means now the new possibility is the fire department are the ones setting your house on fire.
So you have just crossed a major threshold trying to switch from believing in Hetlau to knowing Hetlau and you are immediately hit with a new concept that seems even more frightening than Hetlau, EPMS. Or, someone creating an act that causes an EA harm or even death. The immediate reaction is to allow HNFS to take control and avoid even contemplating the possibility of Hetlau and EPMS.
The key is to go back and better understand the big picture before you try to drill down into the minutiae of Hetlau and EPMS. Remember back in the first article on Hetlau we said:
HET live on other planets and have been present on Earth the whole time life has been present here.
HET don't die, just their bodies die. They essentially live forever, as long as they can maintain the respective system each group resides in.
HET are militaristic in nature.
Those three points are at the core of what is going on and why it is so important to understand EPMS. Basically understanding EPMS allows you to sort of reverse engineer what is going on in order to go back and confirm the 3 core principles. The only problem is you are not going to like the results of your research. So the question then becomes if the truth is unpleasant, do you still want it?
Then if the possibility of EPMS existing is basically tricking someone by creating an event that gets them to respond in a measured way, and that measured response is expected to accomplish a hidden goal that was the whole purpose for the original event. Then the possibility you need to be prepared for is the reason for the events you see occurring on Earth are not going to be the actual reason why they are happening. The possibility exists that your research is going to end up right back at the beginning of the hypothesis testing for Hetlau which will then confirm Hetlau. So Hetlau and EPMS go hand in hand in that an understanding of both mutually confirms each other.
So let's look at the core principle #3. HET are militaristic and see how they might use EPMS to accomplish a militaristic goal. For example, what if you have an enemy that you want to overthrow but you have two major obstacles:
- They are going to be formidable force that will be difficult to defeat
- Your own system lacks the will to engage them
Now instead of fighting two uphill battles yourself, you have divided the enemies' systems against themselves so they will do the work of weakening themselves for you. Second and more importantly, you no longer have to convince your own system that they need to engage the enemy, your own system will be demanding you to let them engage the enemy in order to extract revenge.
Sound familiar? Remember Hermann Goering's famous quote:
“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship…
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”
The problem the EA have getting past that initial strategic concept is that in order to facilitate an event like that you are probably going to need to stage an event that will bring harm and even some death to your own system in order to generate the necessary measured response. For example, say you want to convince peaceful natured civilian populations of both yours and your enemy state that the enemy military performed a preemptive strike on you without the approval of the civilian population of your enemy state. That preemptive strike on your own system is going to have to look very convincing and the resulting damage can't be refuted by conspiracy theorists claiming its a false flag event.
This is where core principle #2 that HET don't die, just their bodies die, comes into play so well for the ESH. Since no one is actually going to die as they know and understand things, they can simply enact an event knowing it will create the appearance to the EA that people died. As far as the EA know, the people did die. It simply makes the impossible possible as the EA suffering from HNFS will refuse to believe its possible even when people who understand the trick being employed are trying to help them to see it for what it is, not the story (history) they are being told.
Even if an EA could believe that it was possible, how can you explain how the HET deal with all the pain and suffering from injuries where death didn't occur since some of them would be injured as well? Its simple the HET can disconnect their nerve endings so they are able to suffer injury and just feign pain when necessary. Remember they design and build human bodies so getting them to function in ways we don't understand is easy for them.
What about the emotional strain on them (ESH) from injuring people (EA)? Do you care about the worm when you place a worm on a fishhook to catch a fish? The relationship between Human (EA) to an animal is more closely representative of the relationship of EA to ESH. So the only emotional strain for them is one we project onto them because we think and or want them to be like us in order to understand them better. In other words just because we care doesn't mean they do.
What about the emotional strain on them (ESH) from injuring people (EA) for such a long period of time? Did you stop to think that the 4.5 billion years Earth has been around is only a fraction of the time ESH have been in existence? So a 100 year EA lifespan would be the equivalent to a Friday night dinner party on the galactic timeline epoch of the ESH reality. So feeling sorry for someone for a 100 years is nothing for them whereas for an EA its an eternity.
So with a better understanding of core principles 3 and 2 and combining them with the concept of EPMS, we can begin to look at core principle 1: HET exist on other planets and have been present on Earth the whole time life has been present here. The key in future articles will be to look at events on Earth and see if we can see the hidden reasoning behind them by looking at what the results were that occurred after them. The possibility exists what we are going to see is that Hetlau are using EPMS to trick the EA into building Earth for them according to their ETA without the EA being aware.
You can see how difficult of a challenge it will be, In addition to the fact it is an unpleasant subject matter. Fortunately, up until now the terminology and concepts have not been present here on Earth in order to evaluate and comprehend the possibility they are even doing this, but now they are.
Follow me on Vocal media for more stories at:
Interested in Astronomy? Check out: