Futurism logo

Review of 'Bladerunner 2049'

The only better movie of this kind is 'Bladerunner,' and hey.

By Paul LevinsonPublished 6 years ago 3 min read
Like

I loved it. So did my son Simon, who's now a father of his own. We loved it almost as much as the original Bladerunner, which we saw more than once on videotape, before there even were DVDs for rent, back in the early 1990s. That's high praise. The only reason Bladerunner 2049 wasn't as good as Bladerunner circa 1982 was that the 1982 movie broke so much new ground. Back in the mid-80s, when I was teaching in the MA in Media Studies Program at the New School, I asked Stephen Jacobs (who then was my student, and has long since become a professor himself, at the Rochester Institute of Technology) to give me an example of cyberpunk movies. "Bladerunner," he replied. It defined the field, at least in the movies. It was and still is that good. Not only that, it began Philip K. Dick's run of stories made into great movies and TV series, with the current example of The Man in the High Castle on Amazon. And it inspired me to write The Civil Right of Robots.

But Bladerunner 2049 did as outstanding a job as could be done in a sequel for that kind of movie — moreover, a sequel on the screen some 35 years later. Rather than reviewing the plot, or even the acting — other than mentioning that both were excellent, and Ryan Gosling as "K" and Harrison Ford reprising his Deckard role were especially excellent — I'll go over certain points and questions which capture this visually and intellectually stunning film (and there will be spoilers):

  • Did you catch that "CCCP Soviet" sign on the building in LA? How could the Soviets still have a sign on a building in 2049? Maybe Putin managed to restore the Soviet Union? Possibly. But I think a better explanation is that Bladerunner 2049 and in turn Bladerunner are and were alternate realities from the outset. Or, at least they are now. The Bladerunner of 1982 took place in 2019, in a world that doesn't look much like our world does now, in 2017 (except insofar as Times Square has seemed increasingly Bladerunner-inspired in the past decade). So the makers of Bladerunner 2049 had to make a sequel in a world that looked 30 years later than the world of 2019 and how it was depicted in 1982. That world has Japan much on its mind -- Japan looked like it could become the dominant computer power back then -- and, of course, the Soviet Union and Russian were in everyone's head, too. Bladerunner 2049 has both Russian and Japanese all over the scenes. It could have not flashed Soviet at all, and benefitted from the unexpected prominence of Russia in our popular culture in the past year. But instead the sign says CCCP and Soviet -- as a shorthand for saying this is the future of Bladerunner 1982/2019, not our future. Very nice touch.
  • Did "K" die at the end? The convention in movie-making is that if (a) you're very badly wounded, and (b) you're lying motionless with your eyes open, then (c) you're dead. On the other hand, we've learned that the replicants can only be killed when their brains are destroyed, by a bullet, or, in the case of Niander's evil, powerful, beautiful replicant apprentice, by deprivation of oxygen because K drowned her. But nothing like that happened to K. He's been badly wounded -- but I'd put my money on his not dying.
  • So, is Deckard a replicant or not? On the yes side, he has a pretty high survival quotient, too. And he did father a replicant with Rachel, who definitely was a replicant. But, wait, that's also evidence that he isn't a replicant, right? I mean, isn't it more likely that human sperm and replicant ovum created a living being, than replicant sperm and replicant ovum? I think so. I am a little less sure that Deckard is human than K is alive, but I'd go with Deckard as human if push came to shove.
  • I enjoyed the Elvis in what's left of Las Vegas hologram, with a quick shot of Marilyn Monroe thrown in. (I just published Marilyn and Monet, so I'm always glad to see her given screen time.) But Elvis belting it out on a stage is a fine homage to David Lynch, and there was a touch of Twin Peaks, somehow, in Bladerunner 2049.

Highly recommend, for the senses and brain. Bladerunner 2049 is 2017 movie-making at top of its game. Kudos to Ridley Scott and everyone involved in this movie.

movie review
Like

About the Creator

Paul Levinson

Novels The Silk Code & The Plot To Save Socrates; LPs Twice Upon A Rhyme & Welcome Up; nonfiction The Soft Edge & Digital McLuhan, translated into 15 languages. Best-known short story: The Chronology Protection Case; Prof, Fordham Univ.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.